AUDIENCETEACHING TEAM
STATUSNOINDEX
ACCESSNOT AUTHENTICATED

INSTRUCTOR BOOK

Teach the workflow.

Notes for running a low-floor, high-ceiling sequence where coding agents make student reasoning more visible rather than less necessary.

TEACHING STANCE

Competence means knowing what to check.

The camp is orientation, not compressed fall statistics. Students should leave able to navigate an R project, make a small evidence trail, supervise a coding agent, and recognize where their current knowledge ends.

  1. 01Begin with a policy question, not a tour of functions.
  2. 02Live-code the reasoning, including errors and repairs.
  3. 03Require a short human prediction before an agent pass.
  4. 04Ask for evidence of verification, not polished output.
  5. 05Keep optional extensions ready for experienced students.
ONE ANALOGY THROUGHOUT

The LLM is the language engine; the harness is the workshop of context, tools, permissions, memory, and feedback; the agent is the engine acting inside that workshop; the student is the investigator. Reuse the mapping: prompt = work order, diff = receipt, tests = measuring instruments.

ACCESS NOTE

noindex discourages search indexing but does not create privacy. If these notes must be private, protect the instructor/ path through the hosting provider or move it outside the public deployment.

SIX MEETINGS

The same investigation gains one new layer each time.

DateMeetingCore moveAgent role
Thu Aug 13, 1-4Lesson + Lab 1Inspect and describe evidence.Read-only explainer
Wed Aug 19, 3-5Lesson 2Transform, join, test, document.Supervised data engineer
Thu Aug 20, 4-5Lab 2Update and compare versions.API assistant with stop rules
Mon Aug 24, 1-4Lesson + Lab 3Plot, model, qualify.Skeptical second reader
Tue Aug 25, 3-5Lesson 4Render and audit a handoff.Evidence-citing auditor
Wed Aug 26, 4-5Lab 4Exchange, run, repair.Independent second reviewer

The increase in agency is deliberate. Do not skip the read-only and planning rungs. Students should experience that better supervision comes from tighter context, permissions, and checks—not simply from a longer prompt.

ROOM PRACTICE

Keep both ends of the experience range moving.

MomentLow-floor supportHigh-ceiling extension
InspectionProvide exact commands and ask for plain-language interpretation.Write reusable assertions and missingness summaries.
WranglingWork from the frozen wide file.Rebuild the long file from the API.
PlottingModify a supplied ggplot.Compare scales, samples, and robust alternatives.
Agent useUse provided prompt frames.Ask the agent to propose tests, then improve them.
HandoffKeep one R script with comments.Render a documented Quarto field notebook.

Working groups are temporary learning structures. Remind students that there is no group submission and that keeping a personal script protects their own learning trail.

ANTICIPATE

Make the likely mistakes teachable.

“The code ran, so it is correct.”
Ask students to state what the output should be, test a key, and inspect a surprising row.
“Missing means zero.”
Compare a genuinely observed zero with NA and discuss how each enters summaries.
“The latest dataset is better.”
Show that new releases can revise history, change coverage, or alter definitions.
“The regression proves the policy worked.”
Return to the claim ladder and ask what assignment mechanism or counterfactual is missing.
“The agent knows the package.”
Open the official documentation, test a minimal example, and compare versions.
“My project runs.”
Restart R, remove workspace objects, and render from the top.

BEFORE EACH CLASS

Keep the room focused on reasoning.

  • Render and open the lesson deck at its stable URL.
  • Run the demonstration script from a clean R session.
  • Confirm the frozen dataset and dictionary links work offline.
  • Prepare one intentional error and one verification demonstration.
  • Keep printed or static prompt frames available if an AI service fails.
  • State the privacy boundary and no-grading policy aloud.

The complete minute-by-minute facilitation architecture, interaction vocabulary, and lesson-specific teaching plans live in the teaching plan. The research basis and implementation rationale live in the evidence brief.